- Our Services
-
Patients and Families
- Get Directions
- Parking
- Childrens Locations
- Getting Around
- Guidelines for Visitors
- Contact a Patient
- Contact Children's
- Send an e-Card
- Gift Shop
Planning a Visit
- Find a Doctor
- Make an Appointment
- Child Health A-Z
- Community Ed.Classes
- Injury Prevention
- International Patients
- Medical Records
- Patient Handbook
- Patient Procedures
Parents
- For Health Professionals
- Research
- Ways to Give
- News
Injury Prevention
2000
Impact of Pediatric Trauma Centers on Mortality in a Statewide System
ABSTRACT
Published in the Aug. 2000 issue of The Journal of Trauma – Injury, Infection, and Critical Care.
Background:
Regional pediatric trauma centers (PTC) were established to optimize the care of injured children. However, because of the relative shortage of PTC, many injured children continue to be treated at adult trauma centers (ATC). As a result, a growing controversy has evolved regarding the impact of PTC and ATC on outcome for injured children.
Methods:
A retrospective analysis of 13,351 injured children entered in the Pennsylvania Trauma Outcome Study between 1993 and 1997 was conducted. Patients were stratified according to mechanism of injury, injury severity, specific organ injury, and type of trauma center: PTC; Level I ATC (ATC I); Level II ATC (ATC II); or ATC with added qualifications to treat children (ATC AQ). Mortality was the major outcome variable measured.
Results:
Most injured children were treated at a PTC or ATC AQ. The majority of children below 10 years of age were admitted to PTC. Patients treated at PTC and ATC had similar injury severity as determined by median Injury Severity Score, mean Revised Trauma Score, and Glasgow Coma Scale. Overall survival was significantly better at PTC and ATC AQ compared with ATC I and ATC II. Survival for head, spleen, and liver injuries was significantly better at PTC compared with ATC AQ, ATC I, or ATC II. Children who sustained moderate or severe head injuries were more likely to undergo neurosurgical intervention and have a better outcome when treated at a PTC. Despite similar mean Abbreviated Injury Scores for spleen and liver, significantly more children underwent surgical exploration (especially splenectomy) for spleen and liver injuries at ATC compared with PTC.
Conclusion:
Children treated at PTC or ATC AQ have significantly better outcome compared with those treated at ATC. Severely injured children (Injury Severity Score > 15) with head, spleen, or liver injuries had the best overall outcome when treated at PTC. This difference in outcome may be attributable to the approach to operative and nonoperative management of head, liver, and spleen injuries at PTC.
Key Words:
Pediatric trauma center; Trauma outcome; Splenic injury; Liver injury; Head injury; Blunt trauma; Penetrating trauma
Douglas A. Potoka, MD; Laura C. Schall, MS; Mary J. Gardner, RN; Perry W. Stafford, MD; Andrew B. Peitzman, MD; Henri R. Ford, MD
From the Department of Surgery (D.A.P., M.J.G., A.B.P., H.R.F.), University of Pittsburgh and Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, the Department of Biostatistics (L.C.S.), University of Pittsburgh, and the Department of Surgery (P.W.S.), University of Pennsylvania and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Last Update
August 29, 2008
August 29, 2008

Child Abuse Expert Appointed to Task Force
Dr. Hackam Receives Award to Generate an Artificial Intestine
International Expert Named Chief of Ophthalmology