Children's Hospital is part of the UPMC family.
Be safe anytime, anywhere.
To find a pediatrician or pediatric specialist, please call 412-692-7337 or search our directory.
A resource for our network of referring physicians.
For more information about research, please call our main office at 412-692-6438.
Ranked #8 Nationally by U.S. News & World Report.
A family’s access to specialty pediatric care can sometimes depend on their home address. Kristin Ray, MD, director of Health Systems Improvements with Children’s Community Pediatrics (CCP), and a Mellon Scholar with the Richard King Mellon Foundation Institute for Pediatric Research, aims to improve the pediatric health care delivery system to make quality care more readily available to all. Dr. Ray discusses two interventions that can help with these challenges, telemedicine and electronic consultations, and the future of this specialty care delivery.
View the transcript for this podcast (PDF)
John Williams: This podcast is for informational and educational purposes only and is not to be
considered medical advice for any particular patient. Clinicians must rely on
their own informed clinical judgments when making recommendations for their
patients. Patients in need of medical advice should consult their personal health
Steph Dewar: From UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, welcome to That's Pediatrics. I'm
Steph Dewar, one of the hospital's based pediatricians here.
John Williams: I'm John Williams from Pediatric Infectious Diseases.
Steph Dewar: Joining us today is our guest, Dr. Kristin Ray, she's an Assistant Professor of
Pediatrics at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, and a member of
our division of General Academic Pediatrics. Welcome Kristin, it's great to have
you here today.
Kristin Ray: Thanks so much, I'm excited to be here.
Steph Dewar: We are very curious to hear about a lot of the work that you've been doing as
far as patient access and referrals. We wonder if you could tell us a little bit
about the project that you've been involved with?
Kristin Ray: Absolutely, I'd love to talk about that. One of the things that I'm very interested
in, as a clinician and from a research perspective, is improving the way that
patients move from primary care to specialty care. Thinking about that referral
process, and not just the end outcome of whether the patient gets an
appointment but also the patient experience of going through that process. I've
been doing a couple of range of projects over time looking at this to better
understand it and also to test some potential solutions thinking about that
particular piece of primary care specialty care referrals. One of those some of
that work started qualitatively so doing interviews with families and asking
them about their experience, seeking subspecialty care. One thing that was
really illuminating there was that as a clinician, I tend to think about the visit
and focus on the visit and do they get to the visit and what happens there?
But for families, so much of their emotional experience of seeking some
specialty care was about the scheduling process and the uncertainties of
knowing who to call, when they were going to get called back, and how long
that process might take. That prompted one of the more intervention pieces
that we've done is a couple years ago Children's transition to an electronic
referral process that allowed when patients were referred, that information to
be sent directly to the subspecialists and subspecialists clinics would call and
schedule those appointments. We used some quality improvement
methodologies to test the impact of that, and we found that it did result in more
patients being scheduled and more visits being attended. Although, still a lot of
room to improve further, which has laid the groundwork for other possible
interventions as well.
John Williams: I'm curious about that, how difficult is it for a family either here at Children's
Hospital of Pittsburgh or in the country to get to a specialist provider like a
pediatric cardiologist or gastroenterologist or infectious disease doctor?
Kristin Ray: It varies depending on many things. One is the specialty referred to because we
know that there is a range of availability and supply of different specialties with
some having larger numbers of providers working in them than others,
developmental and behavioral pediatrics is one that often shows up as just
having far too few for the demand. Another barrier then is geographic location
and that many, many of those pediatric subspecialists are located where
pediatric hospitals are. For kids in some parts of the country, that can be a three
or four hour drive including patients we serve here who are coming in from
other parts of the state. But then there's also additional issues for in terms of
what the scheduling processes are like and what families have to do to get the
appointments. Some families are more savvy or experienced at navigating
healthcare systems and some are not.
All of those different issues layer on top of each other. One survey that was
done maybe a couple years ago reported that of families referred for
subspecialty care, 25% reported that they had significant difficulties accessing
that subspecialty care whether that was difficulty moving through the
processor. Actually, getting the appointment varies but it certainly is something
that families experience.
Steph Dewar: That's interesting, you, I guess, happened on something that was a struggle for
families and used some qualitative processes. I'm just wondering, what was it
that piqued your energy around this issue?
Kristin Ray: Yes. I think for me even growing up, we moved a lot and it was clear that the
circumstances where people live shapes their educational opportunities and
their healthcare opportunities, and all of those sorts of things. That became
apparent even through mobile childhood but also moving into my medical
training. I trained in inner city Philadelphia, but then took every opportunity I
could to do rural rotations, away rotations. That included Lancaster,
Pennsylvania, and Gallup, New Mexico, and Browning, Montana. Just the degree
to which access to care shifts with geography was very apparent through those
experiences. In part because of wanting to still understand and also serve that
rural population more, after finishing residency, I worked for the Indian Health
Service in New Mexico on the Navajo Reservation. So there we were four hours
away from Albuquerque, which was our referral center.
It made many of these issues very apparent including seeking emergent care for
newborns and trying to transfer kids out immediately when they needed that.
But also helping to way with families, you know, was an allergy appointment
worth the four hour drive down and getting someone else to meet their kids
when they got off the bus. Because they weren't going to be back in time to
meet the other kids at the end of the school day and all of those issues. It
became very real for me through that experience, and then coming back to after
that it was when I came to Pittsburgh to do my general pediatric fellowship and
additional research training. Was one of the issues that was most on my mind in
returning to the research world as well.
I should say the other thing that, that experience showed is while we had big
geographic distance, many of the specialty divisions in New Mexico were very
readily available on the phone and would do a lot of having us and labs and then
calling them and interpreting them. So different models of how we co-managed
care, which was also exciting to be part of.
John Williams: It's so interesting to hear how people get to where they are and the experiences
people have. When I was a resident here, which was let's just say a few years
ago, a lot of us went and spent a month on the Navajo Reservation in Window
Rock. I went and spent a month there and I know what you mean, it was a very
different experience in terms of access to specialists. The things that you did as
a pediatrician that you would never do in an urban area, it really changed the
way we practiced. I'm curious to hear you talk about some of these things are
addressable or changeable or there may be interventions and others aren't,
right? Not that we would want to make people move from rural areas to urban
areas, so what are things you've looked at in your research to try and overcome
barriers to fix the things that we can fix?
Kristin Ray: Two of the interventions I'm most excited about currently for this issue are one
is telemedicine and then the other is electronic consultations and they are
paired or similar interventions in that they use technology but they operate in
different ways. So just to talk about what those look like, telemedicine I think
can encompass a wide range of things, but a telemedicine visit is where a
patient and a provider are connected through audio visual teleconference
connection where they can see each other, they can hear each other.
Depending on the setup where the patient is, there may be someone there to
help do some physical exam components and describe it to the specialist. There
are tele stethoscopes, tele otoscopes that can be put in someone's ear to
transmit images or sounds or those sorts of things.
It's a way to accomplish many components of a visit, but perhaps not everyone
at distance. It is an option for addressing the geographic barrier, in particular,
and I think is something that's really exciting for thinking about rural
communities. But at the same time to make it have the highest amount of
information transmitted, you need to have a place set up to do this. Where
those places are, how well they are distributed still becomes an issue. Then the
other side of it is while it may increase connection so that people can connect
across geographic space, it doesn't necessarily increase capacity at all. You still
have the same night number of subspecialists being asked to see more patients
than they have time for in many specialties. The other possible intervention that
I think could pair nicely with increased telemedicine is called electronic
That's more of it's something that's done in some of the healthcare systems in
California and in the VA system. It's a way for generalists and specialists to
communicate to each other about a patient's care needs to come up with a plan
about what the patient needs. Next. It's usually done through what's called
store and forward communication. The general pediatrician might type in some
information in a templated form, maybe attach a picture. It's similar to the
telederm model that I think you may be familiar with here, and then the
specialist then reviews the information and sends recommendations back. It
may say the recommendations could be, "I'm really glad you sent this
information to me, I want to see this patient next week," and that could be a
possibility. It may also be, "We should see this patient. We have an appointment
probably two months, but in the meantime, send these labs so they can show
up with more information."
Or it could say, "I think you've done a great job working through this patient to
date. I think the next step would be to do a trial of this medication, and if that
doesn't work, then send them on to me. It's a way to triage the urgency of a
referral but also enhance the amount of care that a child may get before even
entering into the specialist office, and perhaps even avoiding the visit for some
families which reduces the amount of time that they have to spend, and also
could potentially... With all the carriers then coming a little more through the
general pediatrician, it's a little more centralized, more centered in the medical
home. This is something that several adult systems have done and there's just a
new report out, one of the groups in Boston has started doing this as well. But
we've been working to try to work towards a system here that we're hoping to
pilot with one of the specialties in the near future.
John Williams: I just have to say, we're infectious disease doctors in my group and we like pus. I
feel like we've been missing out on that in a telederm setting.
Steph Dewar: I think that the telederm model is a very interesting one. I also think there's a lot
of interesting challenges with telemedicine. You alluded to one of them, which
is the inability to actually touch the patient and need a proxy of some sort to do
that for you. I would think a proxy that you trusted depending on the type of
examination that needed to be done. Another thing that you didn't mention,
and I just want to clarify for some folks is the issue of time and reimbursement. I
think we shouldn't ignore that and I wonder what thoughts or models you're
aware of are out there?
Kristin Ray: Yes, and so in the current landscape, and it's still some perhaps insured or
dependent, but in the current landscape, most specialists could bill for the
interactions. In the electronic consultation piece, the general pediatrician may
not be able to bill for their time and it is putting more time on them. I think
there is an ongoing awareness of that thinking about what does that mean for
population management and is there a way to value that to value the providers'
time and energy? There has been some... There was a recent report from CMS
that have put out a possible new code for the generalist side of the work in this
interaction. But whether that trickles down to child health reimbursement at
some point will remain to be seen.
Steph Dewar: I think the telederm model here at Children's, at least, on the inpatient side is a
really useful tool that we have which does exactly what you described. It's a
timely way to get feedback from a dermatologist that may or may not then
subsequently require that subspecialist to come physically and see that patient
perhaps collect some pus maybe for those who would be interested.
John Williams: I would be interested.
Steph Dewar: But also then provide treatment recommendations from afar so I think that
model was a very useful one, at least, in my experience on the inpatient side,
and an emergency department, I think it's a common thing that we use. Oddly
enough, Dr. Williams, you mentioned that perhaps it's been a while ago since
you trained in residency and I would say a similar thing probably I was back
further than you. But I know that some of our younger trainees and colleagues
are a little more tech savvy perhaps. I think that we should embrace the fact
that perhaps this is the way that medicine is going, that we use technology more
and more and the face to face isn't mandated as much in care.
Kristin Ray: I like to think of these all as a bunch of tools that it's not that we will always do
care one way or another, but to enhance our toolbox so that for an individual
patient's needs and their circumstances we can decide what's the best way to
meet their needs and answer the question that we have on hand.
John Williams: You've published a lot of nice papers showing that there are ways around some
of these barriers. But I'm really intrigued on this point that we're on now
because, like Dr. Dewar, we're both dating ourselves in our training here. But I
think Steph and I both have Smartphones iPhones in our pocket now. On my
iPhone, I can make an appointment to get my car serviced, I can pay all maybe. I
can do my most of my life things on the smartphone. Is there a national
movement to address some of these barriers? Because I got to tell you, my
teenagers will be stunned if they can't do exactly what you're talking about in a
Kristin Ray: Yes, and I think that speaks to some of the interventions that I'm discussing are
provider to provider and I think more and more patients are going to want to do
connections directly. I think an interesting challenge, as pediatricians and
particularly as primary care pediatricians, is that there's been growth in what
many people call direct to consumer telemedicine. Which are companies that
will see patients in their homes through a computer or a smartphone and assess
respiratory infections and rashes and those sorts of things. I think that's
somewhere that for a couple of reasons, reimbursement being one in particular,
primary care, the medical home has not been able to keep up with the
availability that these national companies are providing. I think that is a place
that is I feel like as somewhat acute challenge that we need to think about how
can we, within the primary care space, make ourselves as accessible as possible
to our patients?
Again, while still maximizing the quality of care and recognizing there may be
some visit reasons that don't make sense through this, but thinking about are
other people offering to do that? In which case, how do we try to keep them
within our sphere and our care. As much as we believe that continuity and care
within the medical home is the best place for a kid to be getting their care.
John Williams: I'm curious to hear a little more about how you got into it? You described your
peripatetic childhood moving a lot and your appreciation for those kinds of
challenges. I also moved a lot, so I hear that. But how did you always know you
wanted to be a pediatrician and how did you get into research in this area?
Kristin Ray: I think, in some ways, interest in pediatrics and interest in research leapfrogged
at different points. There were points where I felt very so much that I wanted to
work with children, there were points that I felt very much I wanted to do
research, at some points I was doing a fair amount of more basic science
research in college. But got to a point where I felt like the distance between
what I was doing in the lab to the patients that I wanted to improve things for
felt a little far. I actually transitioned for a while to doing more investing a lot of
my energies in more advocacy work, and then gradually found that I wanted to
make things still more generalized. That's where I moved back into this more
health services research field in thinking about how healthcare systems work
and how we can make them better able to serve patients. I think interest or
maybe an evolving kind of you never quite get to the total final point, and we
One of the additional areas I'm very excited about is quality improvement work
now, because I think that it, in some ways, is the translational side of health
services research. It's how you take ideas and rapidly implement them and
monitor their improvement. So merging both rigorous health services research
but also rigorous quality improvement methodology is I think they're both
important in my career going forward. I enjoy being able to study things in a
generalizable way, but also try to make change now that is better for patients.
Steph Dewar: One of the things when we talk about technology, it's interesting to reflect back
what it was like to practice medicine with a paper, a piece of paper and a pen.
John Williams: I think we're dating ourselves again.
Steph Dewar: We are but
Kristin Ray: I do this too.
Steph Dewar: ... it's interesting that-
John Williams: Okay, just to clarify, it was not that long.
Kristin Ray: Yeah.
Steph Dewar: It wasn't that long ago and we also talk about how you start to respond to your
email and it wasn't that long ago that we didn't actually have email. Sometimes
it's interesting that in those email exchanges, I sometimes find it necessary to
actually just pick up the phone and talk to someone directly rather than have
that exchange back and forth. I'm just wondering what, as a primary care
pediatrician, to reflect on how much support you can give a family remotely or
digitally as opposed to personally and inner personally and what your thoughts
are about that?
Kristin Ray: I think that's a great question, and I think that there is a lot that we can do over
the phone, and certainly for families, being able to do a follow-up over the
phone means that they don't have to pull a child out of school if they're better.
They don't have to miss work and all of those pieces. I think that, in some ways,
it's the just plain old calling people is undervalued as some of these other
models in terms of telemedicine are able to potentially get reimbursed. There's
still such issues with reimbursement for phone calls, and so thinking about...
Really, I feel like our care, going back to that idea of a toolbox, it really is a full
spectrum and it should include all the way back to a phone call and thinking
about what that means for reimbursement. Moving away from fee for service
models may avoid some of that thinking about how we price out each of these.
But, yeah, I think each piece of those can be helpful and being able to move
between them is valuable.
Steph Dewar: There's another approach in primary care, and I'm not sure what your
experiences, where there are group aged well child care visits bring half a dozen
nine month olds together with their families. I'm not sure what your
experiences with that or your thoughts and feelings about that?
Kristin Ray: Some of my colleagues in the office have been piloting this, and so there've
been a couple of cohorts of groups that have gone through. I think it's an
exciting model and a way to address some of the... Thinking about if you go
through your morning seeing a bunch of four month olds, there are some things
you're going to say to each of them. If you're able to say that one time to all of
them, it may free up time to be able to delve into other ideas. But also there can
be some cross learning, cross reinforcements, and solidarity in being there with
other families. I think there's some potential efficiencies, but also some
additional value. I think it all goes back we've been talking some about primary
care redesign as a term that comes up that... I think it really involves going back
to the basics and thinking about what is it that we want to offer to families?
You first think about the what and then once we've decided on that, then we
can layer in, "Okay, well, how? What's the best way to do this and what's the
best way to do this, and then what does that all look like when we weave it
together?" There's a lot of groups across the country doing some really
interesting work in that area, but I hope we can contribute to that as well here.
John Williams: Well, Dr. Ray, it's been really a pleasure having you join us on the podcast this
week, and thank you so much for sharing your research and your passion for
children's health and getting better help for kids everywhere.
Steph Dewar: And thanks all of you for listening to That's Pediatrics here at UPMC Children's
Hospital of Pittsburgh. Hope you join us next time.
Children's Hospital's main campus is located in the Lawrenceville neighborhood. Our main hospital address is:
UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh
One Children’s Hospital Way
4401 Penn Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA 15224
In addition to the main hospital, Children's has many convenient locations in other neighborhoods throughout the greater Pittsburgh region.
With myCHP, you can request appointments, review test results, and more.
For questions about a hospital bill call:
To pay your bill online, please visit UPMC's online bill payment system.
Interested in giving to Children's Hospital? Visit Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh Foundation's website to make a donation online.